Create better cards
Keep each card focused on one concept, term, example, or misconception.
Teacher guide
Hippo is built around a simple loop: create reviewed cards, help students retrieve one idea at a time, then use classroom signals to decide what needs support next.
Keep each card focused on one concept, term, example, or misconception.
Students retrieve one idea at a time, then rate how well they remembered it.
Treat recall patterns as planning signals, not automatic attainment judgements.
95+ means student-ready quality, not just a card that exists. Aim for one focused concept, real retrieval demand, accessible language, concise feedback, the right card type, and quick teacher review before students use it.
Common teacher questions
Use these when you are deciding what to create, review, study, or adjust next.
Start with one clear concept, term, example, or misconception per card. Good cards ask students to retrieve or explain something specific, not just reread notes. Teachers and students can draft cards manually, import simple term-definition sets, or generate AI draft cards from classroom material before review.
Yes. A simple term-definition or basic recall set should be the starting point. From there, educators can create cloze cards for key relationships, misconception-focused multiple choice, prediction prompts, or error-identification cards. Advanced cards should keep the same core concepts and make the thinking deeper, not add random difficulty.
No. AI drafts are not final until reviewed. Hippo keeps generated cards editable so a teacher or learner can check wording, answer quality, card type, tags, and whether suggested missing concepts really belong in the set before saving them for study.
Students review one card at a time, try to retrieve the answer, reveal it, and rate how well they remembered it. Harder cards come back sooner; known cards wait longer. The study screen is deliberately calm so the student focuses on retrieval rather than dashboards or labels.
Hippo shows practice evidence: recall patterns, participation, possible misconceptions, and support needs. These signals help teachers decide what to reteach or practise next, but they do not replace teacher judgement or claim formal mastery by themselves.
Students can flag a card, and teachers can edit reviewed cards. Good fixes usually shorten the wording, split compound questions, add a clearer hint, or change the card type to better match the concept.
Ready when you are
Free to start. Teachers stay in control: cards are drafts until reviewed, and evidence is a planning signal rather than a formal judgement.